SAP ABAP IMG Activity SIMG_CFMENUOLQWOQV3 (Define Quality Score Procedure)
Hierarchy
☛ BBPCRM (Software Component) BBPCRM
   ⤷ CRM (Application Component) Customer Relationship Management
     ⤷ CRM_APPLICATION (Package) All CRM Components Without Special Structure Packages
       ⤷ QI (Package) QM IMG and area menu
IMG Activity
ID SIMG_CFMENUOLQWOQV3 Define Quality Score Procedure  
Transaction Code S_ALR_87005386   IMG Activity: SIMG_CFMENUOLQWOQV3 
Created on 19981222    
Customizing Attributes SIMG_CFMENUOLQWOQV3   Define quality score procedure 
Customizing Activity SIMG_CFMENUOLQWOQV3   Define Quality Score Procedure 
Document
Document Class SIMG   Hypertext: Object Class - Class to which a document belongs.
Document Name SIMG_CFMENUOLQWOQV3    

In this step, you define the procedures for determining the quality score.

The quality score procedure is defined in the inspection setup for the material master at plant level. You can define a default value for this procedure in the inspection type.

Requirements

  • The following specification limits have been defined in the Settings at Client Level.
    • Highest quality score
    • Lowest quality score
    • Lower limit for good quality
  • If you want to use quality score procedures that access the weighted shares of defects for the characteristics, you must maintain the characteristic weights.
  • If you want to use quality score procedures that access the quality score of the characteristics, you must maintain the defect classes.
  • If you want to use quality score procedures, in which the system calculates the share of scrap, you must:
    • Check whether procedures for estimating the scap share have been defined in Customizing
    • Assign suitable procedures for estimating the scrap share to the characteristics in the task list
    • Identify inspection characteristics as relevant for scrap in their control indicators

Standard settings

A number of commonly used procedures for determining the quality score are implemented in the standard system:

  • Quality score from the usage decision
  • Quality score from the share of defects in the lot
  • Quality score from the shares of defects for the characteristics
    • From the maximum share of defects
    • From the weighted average share of defects
  • Quality score from the quality score of the characteristics
    • From the minimum (worst) quality score
    • From the weighted average quality score

The table has the delivery class G. The following name range is reserved for the user

  • Quality score procedure 9*, A*, ... , Z*

Recommendation

  • Use the procedure in the standard system.
  • Decide on certain procedures for each inspection type; if possible, do not differentiate according to material groups or plants.

Activities

  1. Determine which procedures for calculating the quality score should be used. You can make a distinction on the basis of the:
    • Plant
    • Inspection type
  2. Modify the table of quality score procedures according to your needs. If the procedures contained in the standard system are not sufficient, you must create additional procedures using function modules.
  3. Define the quality score procedures in the Default Values for the Inspection Type or in the inspection setup for the material.

Further notes

Example for representing the quality score procedure according to VDA-1
(VDA = Association of German automobile manufacturers).

According to VDA-1 the best quality score = 100, the worst = 1.
In this industry sector, the vendors are divided into three classes:

  1. Quality score >= 96
  2. Quality score >= 90 and < 96
  3. Quality score < 90

The formula for calculating the quality score is:
Quality score = 101 - (1 * A1 + 5 * A2 + 30 * A3 + 100 * A4) : A5
A list of the characters and their meanings follows:

  • A1 = Number of goods receipts without defects
  • A2 = Number of goods receipts with minor defects
  • A3 = Number of goods receipts with major defects
  • A4 = Number of goods receipts with critical defects
  • A5 = Total number of goods receipts

To reproduce the procedure in the system according to VDA-1, proceed as follows:

  1. Define defect classes with the following quality scores:
    1. Critical defect with quality score = 101-100 = 1
    2. Major defect with quality score = 101-30 = 71
    3. Minor defect with quality score = 101-5 = 96
  2. Assign these defect classes to the codes defined in the defect catalog.
  3. Define defect codes in the task list characteristics in case a characteristic is rejected.
  4. Choose the procedure contained in the standard system that determines the quality score using the minimal quality scores from all inspection characteristics.

In this way, an inspection lot with no defects receives a quality score of 100, an inspection lot with minor defects receives a quality score of 96, an inspection lot with major defects receives a score of 71 and an inspection lot with critical defects receives a score of 1. On this basis you can classify vendors according to VDA-1 in the QM info system, if you have predefined the corresponding class limits in the info system.

Business Attributes
ASAP Roadmap ID 204   Establish Functions and Processes 
Mandatory / Optional 3   Nonrequired activity 
Critical / Non-Critical 2   Non-critical 
Country-Dependency A   Valid for all countries 
Assigned Application Components
Documentation Object Class Documentation Object Name Current line number Application Component Application Component Name
SIMG SIMG_CFMENUOLQWOQV3 0 HLA0006213 Inspection Lot Completion 
Maintenance Objects
Maintenance object type C   Customizing Object 
Assigned objects
Customizing Object Object Type Transaction Code Sub-object Do not Summarize Skip Subset Dialog Box Description for multiple selections
V_TQ06 V - View SM30 9999999999 Function Module for Quality Scores 
History
Last changed by/on SAP  19981222 
SAP Release Created in