Hierarchy

⤷

⤷

Basic Data
Data Element | P02_ELM_FAULT_FACOD |
Short Description | ELM: Fault Code/Description Code (DescriptionCode) |
Data Type
Category of Dictionary Type | D | Domain |
Type of Object Referenced | No Information | |
Domain / Name of Reference Type | P02_ELM_FAULT_FACOD | |
Data Type | NUMC | Character string with only digits |
Length | 5 | |
Decimal Places | 0 | |
Output Length | 5 | |
Value Table |
Further Characteristics
Search Help: Name | ||
Search Help: Parameters | ||
Parameter ID | ||
Default Component name | ||
Change document | ||
No Input History | ||
Basic direction is set to LTR | ||
No BIDI Filtering |
Field Label
Length | Field Label | |
Short | 10 | F Code |
Medium | 15 | Fault Code |
Long | 20 | Fault Code |
Heading | 5 | FCode |
Documentation
Definition
Each four-digit DescriptionCode is assigned only once, meaning that it is specifically assigned to a particular notification (error, warning, or information). In this context, the notifications with user-defined texts need to be mentioned: The DescriptionCode is predefined, but the notification can be set freely.
Errors that occur before the validation level are either problems with the transfer or with incorrect documents. Some of these errors are caught by layers under the application layer. With a few exceptions (signature), errors on this level are technical errors and a SOAP fault is returned accordingly. If there are problems with the signature, a warning is issued and the process of document processing is continued, an invalid (meaning that it does not come from Swissdec) certificate results in a SalaryDeclarationFault.
Meaning of Codes of First Validation Level:
- 0100
The transfer was rejected as the transferred document was created with a non-certified transmitter or is not signed
Errors with the certificate: Independent of the validity of the signature, the certificate is not from Swissdec. Data from a transmitter that is not certified are rejected as are unsigned documents. - 0100
The transfer was rejected as the transferred document was created with a non-certified transmitter or is not signed
Errors with the certificate: The signature is not valid but the certificate is from Swissdec. Problems with the signature are tolerated in the first operating phase; a warning is issued instead of an error. - 0101
The transfer was rejected as the transferred document contains an invalid signature - 0110
Volume of data is too large (The service cannot process the transferred data due to its size)
Document is too large: The receiver cannot process the document.
Meaning of Codes of Second Validation Level:
- 1000
Parser notification (English)
The validity of each transferred document is checked on receipt. Validation errors can occur if the document is not well-structured or does not correspond to the schema structure (schema namespace or minor version do not correspond with the current schema or instance document does not conform to the schema). Rejections are always issued for validation problems, meaning that there are no warnings, only error messages. - 1100
Job key invalid
The job key is invalid: The job key for the asynchronous status query is invalid, meaning that the query cannot be processed.
Meaning of Codes of Plausibility Level:
- 2xxxx:
Document is not plausible: The document does not fulfill all plausibility rules. - 2001
The postal code {0} in the enterprise address is not valid. - 2003
The date of birth of person {0} {1} is after the date on which this wage notification was created. - 2004
Person {0} {1} is over 100 years old. - 2005
Person {0} {1} has an {2} income with a contribution period that has an end time before its start time. - 2007
Person {0} {1} has a higher ALV-AC-income than the Fr. {2} limits - 2007
Person {0} {1} has a higher UVG-LAA-income subject to contributions than the Fr. {2} limits - 2009
Person {0} {1} has a higher ALV2-AC2-income than the Fr. {2} limits - 2013
The calculation period of the declaration (AccountingPeriod) is not valid. - 2014
Person {0} {1} has an ALV wage that is larger than the AHV wage. - 2015
The gross wage of person {0} {1} (gross wage STV (z8)) declared for the wage statement does not correspond with the total of the specified wage components (wage (z1), additional benefits (z2), irregular benefits (z3), capital payments (z4), employee stock options (z5), payments for supervisory board members (z6), other payments (z7)). - 2016
The net wage of person {0} {1} (net wage STV (z11)) declared for the wage statement does not correspond with the amount from the specified gross wage (gross wage STV (z8)) minus the deductions (AHV-IV-EO-ALV-NBUV contributions (z9), company pension fund (z10)). - 2017
The postal code {0} in the address of person {1} {2} is not valid. - 2020
Note! The number of statistical wage data of all persons does not correspond with the specified number of statistic salary tags(NumberOf-StatisticSalaries-Tags). <StatisticSalary> elements are counted although the counter links to <NumberOf-StatisticSalaries-Tags>! - 2021
The number {0} of all persons does not correspond with the specified number {1}. - 2022
The postal code of an additional recipient (cc address) is not valid.
Notifications with user-defined text are also possible (2800, 2850)
[Source: Suva, "Guidelines for Wage Data Transfer # Confirmation and Notifications" (AcknowledgementNotification_20061006.doc, Version 20061006 - Issue 05/23/2007)]
Use
Dependencies
Example
History
Last changed by/on | SAP | 20081217 |
SAP Release Created in | 600 |