Hierarchy
⤷ PY-DE (Application Component) Germany
⤷ PC01 (Package) HR Payroll: Germany
Basic Data
Data Element | IABRJJ_LST |
Short Description | Last Evaluation (In-Period) |
Data Type
Category of Dictionary Type | D | Domain |
Type of Object Referenced | No Information | |
Domain / Name of Reference Type | GJAHR | |
Data Type | NUMC | Character string with only digits |
Length | 4 | |
Decimal Places | 0 | |
Output Length | 4 | |
Value Table |
Further Characteristics
Search Help: Name | ||
Search Help: Parameters | ||
Parameter ID | ||
Default Component name | ||
Change document | ||
No Input History | ||
Basic direction is set to LTR | ||
No BIDI Filtering |
Field Label
Length | Field Label | |
Short | 5 | PYear |
Medium | 7 | PayYear |
Long | 15 | Payroll Year |
Heading | 15 | Payroll Year |
Documentation
Definition
Specifies the period (month/year) up to which the retroactive accounting in previous evaluation periods should be considered.
Use
For live evaluations, the report must always be started in evaluation periods that follow each other directly in order to ensure documentation without gaps for the investment institutions.
Retroactive accounting for periods that were already evaluated live could potentially cause retroactive changes to the contributions to AVmG that would have to be disclosed to the relevant investment institutions.
Therefore, if possible retroactive accounting differences are to be taken into account in the evaluation period that was most recently executed, specify here the period in which you executed the last evaluation (in-period of the last evaluation). This is normally the end period of the last evaluation period (or possibly a later period: see Special case in the example below).
You can find the corresponding period in the header of the list of the last evaluation period: From the point of view of <Period/year>.
If there are no retroactive accounting differences that should be taken into account in the most recently executed evaluation period, leave the field Last evaluation (in-period) blank.
This is the case, for example, with your first live evaluation or when you execute internal evaluations that are not sent to the investment institutions.
Example: Last evaluation (in-period)
- Execute the first live evaluation, e.g. for the periods 01 to 04, in period 04 (after the period 4 payroll). Since it is the first live evaluation, there are no retroactive accounting differences from the previous evaluations.
Enter 01/2002 to 04/2002 as the evaluation period and leave the field Last evaluation (in-period) blank.
You have entered for one of your employees an amount of 500.- EUR in infotype German Pension Reform (0699) in period 04 for period 03. Retroactive accounting is therefore carried out into period 03. The evaluation uses the current payroll results from the point of view of period 04 (in-period of the evaluation):
For-period In-period
01/2002 01/2002
02/2002 02/2002
03/2002 04/2002
04/2002 04/2002
In the output list, the amount of 500.- EUR is shown for the period 03/2002.- Execute in period 08 the next evaluation for the periods 05 (subsequent period) to e.g. period 08.
All retroactive accounting should be taken into account in the evaluation period 01 to 04. The in-period of the most recently executed evaluation is period 04.
Enter 05/2002 to 08/2002 as the evaluation period and enter period 04/2002 as the Last evaluation (in-period).
For the employee mentioned above, you have increased the amount from 500.- EUR to 550.- EUR in infotype German Pension Reform (0699) in period 07 for period 03. A (new) retroactive accounting is therefore carried out into period 03.
In the output list for the evaluation period 05-08, the differences from the previous evaluation period 01-04 are now additionally shown.
For-period In-period
03/2002 04/2002 old payroll report P (previous): 500.- EUR
03/2002 07/2002 current payroll result A: 550.- EUR
Since an amount of 500,- EUR was shown and sent to the investment institution for the relevant employee for the evaluation period 01-04, this amount now appears as a negative value.- Special case
- The end period of the chosen evaluation period does not necessarily have to coincide with the most recently settled period. You do not necessarily have to execute the evaluation for periods 01-04 in period 04 (as was the case in the example above).
- You can also execute this in a later period, e.g. in period 08.
- If possible retroactive accounting differences in the previous evaluation period 01-04 should be taken into account for the next evaluation (that then must have period 05 as the starting period), make sure that you enter under Last evaluation (in-period) the period in which the last evaluation was executed. In this case you would enter period 08 here, since the last evaluation was executed in this period (in-period of the last evaluation).
If you were to enter period 04 (end period of the last evaluation) here, it would not be possible for the system to take into account retroactive accounting from periods 05-08 into periods 01-04.
History
Last changed by/on | SAP | 20030108 |
SAP Release Created in | 470 |